I fought losing idealism as a compromise in my beliefs--a wholly unacceptable compromise. I fought being a realist--a pragmatist. That was an evil option I was determined to avoid at all costs. I did not recognize what the nature or magnitude of those costs might be.
This week I have spoke with a number of people, whom I think of as pragmatists--realists--reminded me of those two extremes. Today reminded me to reevaluate how I understand myself.
Today's cold is having the unexpected effect of clarifying my misconception--of who the realists are, and who the idealists are. One is not better than the other. It is a balance between those two extremes that comes the closest to offering any modicum of fulfillment.
My friends express an idealism that I don't know how to reconcile. Life is not perfect. Seeking to find just the right life path to live one's principles does not guarantee a "happy"--a fulfilling life. My friends are not alone in wanting to find that perfect life--that life without compromise.
Being idealistic is exhausting. It is not to say the investment should never be made. Quite to the contrary. Being idealistic is pragmatism's antidote. Idealism is a vaccine protecting a person from being infected with cynicism.
But, pragmatism is not the enemy--not idealism's antagonist. I go to bed tonight exhausted by the idealist's demand for the perfect life's path. I know no perfect pursuit, which is free of compromise.
Is it possible that what we view as living a compromised life is in truth our perfection, rather than a pristine pursuit of an idyllic life to which we should aspire?
Is it possible that what we view as living a compromised life is in truth our perfection, rather than a pristine pursuit of an idyllic life to which we should aspire?
No comments:
Post a Comment